The Ahmedinejad Christmas speech caused 'international offence'. Granted, he's not the most tolerant man in the world when it comes to certain sections of society but then neither's the Pope, and nobody's stopped him broadcasting his message on Christmas Day. Funnily enough, those who've said this is a cynical grab for ratings probably reckon without the British public's desire to watch ballroom dancing or Coronation Street as opposed to a somewhat nutty president of a Middle Eastern country.
If it's been said once it's been said x number of times, where x probably stands for any number you want it to. Creating a big hoo-hah will give it more publicity than just the initial number of viewers would have done.
You may not agree with him. I don't. But then I don't write in and complain every time something I'm not a fan of comes on the TV. Rather than jumping up and down and shouting "Ban it. I don't like him. Not fair!" why doesn't somebody actually fire back with a few witty reposites that neatly take apart his arguments. Just a thought, like.
And, as Tim W says, "you’d be hard put to find any Church of England bishop who would disagree with what is said (rather than the man who is saying it or his attitudes or actions outside this particular statement)."
Final word: Sunny from Pickled Politics, who I don't normally agree with:
"I don’t burn a candle for Ahmedinejad - he is clearly a tyrant and a racist. But there’s two fronts on which I find arguments against this C4 stunt a bit hypocritical.
1) The first is this threat that Channel 4’s funding should be cut or curtailed because of this. BBC News reports:
Conservative MP Mark Pritchard, a member of the all-party media group, said: “Channel Four has given a platform to a man who wants to annihilate Israel and continues to persecute Christians at Christmas time. “This raises serious questions about whether Channel 4 should receive an increased public subsidy for their programmes.”
Criticise Channel 4 all you like, but I find it fundamentally undemocratic that a broadcaster should be threatened financially for doing things the majority don’t like.
I thought these people wanted free speech? After all, MA isn’t saying anything racially inflammatory this time. Should I be burning my license fee in protest everytime the BBC invite Nick Griffin on television?"
Peace on earth and goodwill to all men and all that.
In other news, I got a recipe book for over 400 soups for Christmas. That's far more exciting.
Hope everybody's had a safe, happy Christmas. Normal service about where the media's going and all that jazz, plus a few odds and sods on football teams you've never heard of, resumes later.