Anybody not from Britain looking at the Twitter trending topics today would have probably been baffled to see Mrs Slocombe's Pussy near the top. Thanks to the British sense of humour, the catchphrase from 70s sitcom Are You Being Served was all over the microblogging site in tribute to the death of comic actress Mollie Sugden . Jonathan Ross was one of those responsible for getting the topic to the top of Twitter charts. Sure enough, other countries were a bit puzzled by the trend, so much so that both Techcrunch and Mashable wrote stories complaining that Twitter was getting infected with spam again . They were soon put right in the comments.
I'm not an overly big fan of the show, but this little Twitter trend and the reaction does appeal to my sense of humour. You'd like to think that Mollie Sugden would have found it funny as well. It's a fitting tribute.
But among all this there is a serious point to be made, with regard to the old blogs v journalism arguments. Especially in light of TMZ's Michael Jackson scoop, there seems to be a general reluctance to trust blogs ahead of traditional media, even if the blogs have a long and trusted record. Sadly, this little snippet gives the journalist a nice easy own goal.
As many comments in both articles have said, a very quick bit of research would have shown that this was a genuine trending topic and not a story, bar one of those 'aren't Twitter users funny' filler pieces. As it was, both writers immediately jumped to the conclusion that they had a Twitter spam story on their hands and published, seemingly without any checks or approach for comment. Plenty of ammunition for the blogging naysayers.
[But then again some newspaper journalism can't claim to be a great deal better].
On the other hand, there is a lot to be said here for the fact that both writers visibly corrected their copy very quickly after being called to account, and were prepared to brave the comments. And that's something you cannot imagine the many newspapers doing, period. Plus, it did bring up the small but interesting question of how Twitter blocks certain phrases from trending.
It doesn't excuse the rather sloppy research (and desire to pull out a quick post) in the first place . But it does show how news can be more democratic and accountable, and quickly corrected, and that's got to be a good thing.
 For anybody not familiar with the sitcom, it was a running joke where Mrs Slocombe, a very prim and proper lady, would constantly refer to her pet cat in a variety of ways laced with innuendo.
 Although it's easy to forget that pussy has much stronger connotations in the US than it does here.
 And I'm writing this as both a fan and a regular reader of both blogs. I think they're better than a lot of traditional news sources. But when they do mess up, it's a lot more public.